Your Current Site:

 Practice Areas » Business and Commercial Law » Preconstruction Contract Termination and...

Information:

This article and this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information provided should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. You should always consult a suitably qualified attorney regarding any specific legal problem or matter and not rely on the content of this article. Nothing on this site is intended to create an attorney-client relationship and nothing posted constitutes legal advice. We cannot guarantee that the information is accurate, complete or up-to-date. 

CONTACT US:

* = required field(s):

By submitting this form I agree to the Terms of Use

Preconstruction Contract Termination and Deposit Return Litigation

As a leader of the Pre-Construction Contract Termination and Deposit Return Litigation plaintiff’s bar, the law firm of Urban Thier & Federer, P.A. continues to set the standard for pre-construction deposit return litigation cases. The law firm’s growing list of successes continues to shape this area of the law – clearly setting Urban Thier & Federer, P.A. apart from other law firms and lawyers serving client purchasers who are seeking to terminate their preconstruction contracts and recover their deposits.

On June 26, 2009, the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals, which is the State of Florida appeals court for all central Florida State trial courts located in Brevard, Citrus, Flagler, Hernando, Marion, Orange, Osceola, Putnam, Seminole, St. Johns and Sumter counties, and one level below the Supreme Court of Florida, unanimously affirmed this law firm’s win in the case of Plaza Court, L.P., v. Baker-Chaput and O’Brien, 17 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). In the Plaza Court case, this law firm won in the state trial court – the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida, located in Orlando, Florida – based upon the developer’s violation of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (“ILSFDA”). The Fifth District Court of Appeals unanimously sided with this law firm’s clients, adopted this law firm’s below Harvey decision, and ruled that purchasers have a full three years to rescind under ILSFDA where the developer fails to clearly provide for the right in the purchase agreement/contract for sale. This is an especially important decision because it addresses the issue of whether the 15 U.S.C. § 1703(c) rescission right is limit to two years, when not clearly disclosed in the contract, or the full three years provided for in 15 U.S.C. §§ 1709 and 1711 for all ILSFDA remedies.

On January 5, 2009, the federal Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which is the appeals court for all federal courts for the States of Alabama, Florida and Georgia, and one level below the United States Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed this law firm’s win in the case of Harvey v. Lake Buena Vista, LLC, 568 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 1365 (M.D. Fla. 2008) affirmed Harvey v. Lake Buena Vista, LLC, 2009 WL 19340 (11th Cir. 2009). In the Harvey case, this law firm won in the federal trial court – the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division – based upon both breach of contract and Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701- 1720 (“ILSFDA”) claims. The developer defendant, Lake Buena Vista Resort, LLC, appealed the trial court decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. After extensive appellate proceedings, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals three judge panel assigned to the case unanimously “per curiam” affirmed the trial court decision.

Urban Thier & Federer, P.A., remains on the cutting edge of this field and continues to actively shape this entire area of the law in favor of purchasers.

With offices in Orlando, Florida, and Munich, Germany, Urban Thier & Federer, P.A. continues to assist buyers throughout the United States and European Union countries in terminating their preconstruction purchase agreements. In many cases the law firm’s clients are not even required to travel to Florida.

If you are a buyer/purchaser who is a party to a preconstruction purchase and sale agreement, we encourage you to consult with this law firm or another law firm and explore your rights and options.

Information:

This article and this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information provided should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. You should always consult a suitably qualified attorney regarding any specific legal problem or matter and not rely on the content of this article. Nothing on this site is intended to create an attorney-client relationship and nothing posted constitutes legal advice. We cannot guarantee that the information is accurate, complete or up-to-date. 

CONTACT US:

* = required field(s):

By submitting this form I agree to the Terms of Use

Orlando, Florida

Orlando, Florida Attorneys

200 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
Phone: +1 (407) 245-8352
Fax: +1 (407) 245-8361

Contact...

Palm Beach Florida

Palm Beach, Florida Attorneys

205 Worth Avenue, Suite 3071
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
Phone: +1 (561) 293-2509
Fax: +1 (561) 293-2510

Contact...

Ojai, California

Ojai California  Attorneys Law Firm

323 East Matilija Street, Suite 215
Ojai, California 93023
Phone: +1 (626) 899-4696
Fax: +1 (626) 899-4697

Contact...

Munich, Germany

Attorney Munich Germany

Romanplatz 12
D-80639 Munich / Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 89 173 002 22
Fax: +49 (0) 89 173 002 20

Contact...

Aachen, Germany

Attorney Aachen Germany

Wilhelmstr. 58
D-52070 Aachen / Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 241 91 26 626
Fax: +49 (0) 89 173 002 20

Contact...

London, Great Britain

London - England Attorney

Greenwood House,
4-7 Salisbury Court
London, United Kingdom
 EC4Y 8AA
Phone: +44 020 3744 0564
Fax: +44 020 3744 0565

Contact...